WILPF at the BioWeapons Treaty meetings in Geneva (12/10-14) and good news for the Boston WILPF "fightback" against U.S. Bioterror lab.

International WILPF statement to the UN Bioweapons Treaty meetings and update on WILPF's "fightback" against a Boston Bioterror lab.

Susi Snyder, our WILPF Secretary General, read the statement on December 10 to delegates of States Parties to the Biological Weapons Convention assembled in Geneva . This year discussion centers on bringing national laws into conformity with the treaty.

In 2006 Boston WILPF presented a paper on the commmunity "fight back" against the proposed Project Bioshield BSL-4 level lab in Boston. This year they did not attend because they felt they had no expertise on the laws involved. However, Boston members hope to participate in a panel for delegates on Bio-lab safety next year.

Good News for Boston WILPFand the Roxbury community whose fightback against the Homeland Security Bioshield BSL-4 lab Boston University is building there is continuing to gain ground.

Now comes confirmation of their worries from a respected source. Read the Boston Globe story on the blistering report released yesterday by an independent panel of scientists, the respected National Review Council.

Read the LA Times article on runaway "bioterror" labs. Perhaps even more exciting are the hearings conducted by Representative DIngell that have brought the problematic nature of the labs under Congressional oversight. Dingell was originally an enthusiastic supporter of the Bio Shield labs sprouting up in universities around the country. Now he wonders at the wisdom of launching so many labs with so little clear direction or supervision.

* * * * * * *

For more background on the Bioweapons Conventon, the U.S. Bioterror lab programs and the Boston "fightback" explore these links:

Essential background information on the Biological Weapons Convention is on the Reaching Critical Will web site. You will find there also a copy of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention which is the subject of this Review Conference. The BWC has been ratified by 155 national governments, including the United States.

* * * * * * *

The background information below was prepared in 2005, in the earlier stages of Boston WILPF involvement with the Roxbury Community resistance to the proposed BSL-4 Biolab approaching completion in 2007.

The U.S., in the person of John Bolton, torpedoed the Bioweapons inspection protocol in 2001. During the same period U.S. "bio-defense research was vastly expanded. Explore the WILPF DISARM web pages for information on Biodefense and suspected Bio warfare projects of which most US citizens are unaware. Some of it is pretty scary stuff. If you become seriously interested visit the Sunshine Project web site and subscribe to Edward Hammond's list serve. He is our most committed and savvy watch dog, and you can follow genetic engineering that is creating new forms of small pox for which there is no vaccine, and reconstructing the 1918 flu virus that killed millions. Learn why and how communities like Boston are resisting university labs that are bringing dangerous pathogens into local neighborhoods. If you want to get involved, let DISARM know. We need you!

Susan Gracey (left, with Medea Benjamin to the right) presents the story of Boston WILPF's participation in resistance to a Homeland Security Bio shield Level-4 Lab in a Boston Afro-American community. The women are speaking at a Bio-Democracy event co-sponsored by WILPF in Philadelphia in June, 2005.

The DISARM resolution on bio-weapons was accepted by the U.S. Board and the WILPF International Executive Committee. It gives us a foundation on which to build as we approach the meetings of the Bio-Weapons Convention Committee in Geneva in December, and the 2006 Review Conference. The place to begin, of course, is in our own communities where questionable U.S. bio-weapons research projects are taking place. WILPF DISARM also submitted an introduction giving context to the resolution, including a summary of previous WILPF resolutions on Bio-weapons.

Help us survey and report on bio-weapons research in your own community. If the US won't let the UN do it, who will? Find other groups and local officials, as Boston WILPF has, with which to work. The Administration claims the research is purely defensive, but watchdogs have already found evidence of treaty violation. Check your 2005 version Mil Corp Manual Section VI page 123 for basic information on investigating local university and military bio-defense laboratories. Explore the Sunshine Project web site for more information. Click on the Bio-weapons tab for the most recent versions of the map and key to university and military bio-defense research labs, reprinted in our 2005 and 2006 Mil-Corp manuals which appear here. Serious monitors should subscribe to the Sunshine Project list serve.

Click here for links to additional resources on bio-defense and bio-weapons research.

Examine the US Bio-defense Budget since rejecting the UN Biodefense inspection protocol in 2001

Go to the Reaching Critical Will page on the Bio- weapons treaty for WILPF background information. Some has not been updated since before the 2000 Fifth Review Conference, but you will still find some useful information here. And updating is in progress.

BOSTON WILPF DISARM TEAM CONFRONTS LOCAL BIO-SHIELD LAB

Boston WILPF Branch has joined local efforts to keep a dangerous Level-4 BioShield Lab out of an Afro-American community there -- and to keep such labs out of Massachusetts everywhere. Community resistance is based on the knowledge that experiments will be with the most dangerous known pathogens and that accidents do happen in these high security labs. Boston University, host for the proposed lab, has had accidents in labs of lesser security which it has sought to hide from public knowledge.

Susan Gracey and a team of WILPF members from the DISARM committee are also aware of far reaching dangers in the entire multi-billion dollar Homeland Security Bio-Shield project which appears to be defying the provisions of the UN Bioweapons Treaty. They are working with local groups like ACE (Alternatives for Community and Environment) to stop the lab altogether if possible. Other WILPF Branches can explore the ACE web site for insight into the problems posed by such university hosted labs, and into organizing resistance to them.

Another group in the coalition, Boston Mobilization, is spear heading the campaign to at least mandate local and state supervision of this and any other Bio-Shield lab proposed for Massachusetts. At present there is no real oversight of these labs by any body, federal or local. WILPFers who wish to join in resistance to, and/or regulation of such labs in their own communities should explore the Boston Mobilization web site which outlines the campaign for state supervision in Massachusetts. Such supervision, of course, may prove unacceptable to Homeland Security -- and if so that will be another argument for ending the program entirely.

PHILADELPHIA JUNE BIO-DEMOCRACY EVENT

WILPF joined United for Peace and Justice, Code Pink and other organizations in co-sponsoring a lively Bio--Democracy event in Philadelphia June 18 to 21, 2005. It coincided with the annual high level bio-tech conference for pharmaceutical companies and bio-engineering firms in search of government and other contracts. The lively Bio-Democracy events hi-lighted citizen resistance to genetic engineering of seeds, private patents on human genes, and the "bio-defense" research that has, in the organizer's words "frightening offensive capabilities."

Photo to left: The U.S. is certainly stockpiling nuclear weapons, but we cannot be certain there is any stockpiling of biological weapons at this point as this banner seems to imply. However, the current vastly expanded program seems to be pointing in that direction. We believe the U.S. Administration must return to strict adherence to the Bioweapons Convention and lead the way toward the transparency and universality that is necessary for an enforceable inspection regime.

Susan Gracey represented WILPF at the "biodefense" teach-ins, and effectively told the story of Boston's citizen resistance to the proposed Level 4 Bio-Shield research laboratory there. She also led a workshop on resistance to Bio-Shield labs around the country.

Barry Kissin shared his article on Fort Detrick and the U.S. military bio weapons research which describes the huge expansions underway there and gives an overview of the research and its dangers. (Barry is convinced this is not a defensive program and in 2006 ran for Congress in order to raise the issues with the public.)

Philadelphia Branch members of the DISARM committee joined in the teach-ins and rallies, one of them decked out as a huge red genetically engineered tomato gone haywire. Carol Urner also participated for WILPF and was interviewed by both ABC news and the Philadelphia Inquirer, bringing both a plea for sanity and some added publicity for WILPF.

The event included marches, giant puppets, and rallies. The Philadelphia police were out in full force to contain the demonstrations. About a thousand skate boarders joined the demonstrations in an action which took the police by surprise. Unfortunately a policeman became over excited when confronting the demonstrators, and died of a heart attack. The demonstrators, who were admittedly rambunctious but also peaceful, called off the rest of their rally, and joined in expressions of sorrow for the loss of life. The action was also a surprise to WILPF which generally does not support "surprise" actions of this sort, but believes all demonstrations should be both non-violent and transparent in relationship to authorities and all parties involved.

 

 

 

 

 

A federal review of a controversial laboratory being built by Boston University was "not sound and credible" and failed to adequately address the consequences of highly lethal germs escaping from the project, according to a blistering report released yesterday by an independent panel of scientists. federal review of a controversial laboratory being built by Boston University was "not sound and credible" and failed to adequately address the consequences of highly lethal germs escaping from the project, according to a blistering report released yesterday by an independent panel of scientists.

The story of the resistance and their own role is told best in the paper Joan Ecklein delivered to delegates at the 2007 UN Bioweapons Treaty Review Conference in Geneva.

What started as a brave but lonely movement in one depressed community has now, with WILPF's help, grown into broad community resistance in wider Boston. At November's end the citizen's movement won a major victory when

Resistance began when residents learned that high security BSL-4 labs research rare diseases for which there is no cure, and which are almsot always fatal. Of course they were assured there was no danger, but soon they began learning that in other labs there were accidents. Some resulted in deaths of lab workers, others had actually released deadly pathogens into the community. Opposition and strong leadersp had already developed int he community when Boton WILPF members began coming it to support the effort.